AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+822%
11.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU102
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
