AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV516
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
