AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
+616%
7.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Fiji
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB
(215-0862046)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
