AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4520 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+941%
1 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4520
0.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2009
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV710
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
RV710
(215-0725016)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
