AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2000
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
230 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
7.360GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
NV15
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GeForce2 Ultra
TeraScale
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
7.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.5
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
