AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
+7%
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
