AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 545 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+140%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 545
0.415 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
800
Shading Units
144
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF116
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
