AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 6 PCI
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
560.0 MPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.120 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
NV44
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
