AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro S10000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000
+240%
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Zaphod
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
