AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
480 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+101%
1 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV670
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
