AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+599%
1 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV630
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
