AMD FireStream 9250 vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Arc A380
+319%
4.198 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
