AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
T1000
+403%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
