AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+1255%
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
