AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
13760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+13837%
69.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
320
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
440
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
285W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
