AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+2578%
13.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2150 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Navi 22
-
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
