AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 176W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+2071%
10.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
176W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
