AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+1059%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
107W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
