AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
+831%
4.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2020
FireStream
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
