AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
19136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+16342%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2024
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
19456
16
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
153 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
