AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+62%
0.497 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
