AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030
+126%
1.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2017
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.49 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.23 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.62 GFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1127 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.23 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
