AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+84%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
112
16
TMUs
28
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
