AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+1174%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
