AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (48W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+41%
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
48W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
