AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
+563%
3.297 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2016
FireStream
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
265W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
