AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+2%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2880
176
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
GK180
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
