Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +68%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
20
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Curacao
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy