Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +2277%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
825 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
13.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.748 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.992 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
167.8 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF119
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
29W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy