Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +703%
3.994 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
4
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV670
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy