Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +2673%
3.994 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
3
2048
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy