Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +3932%
3.226 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
1
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy