Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q +213%
6.18 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GA107
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net