AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
+57%
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
Lexa
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
