AMD FirePro W6170M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
+413%
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
RV730
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
