Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860

AMD FirePro W6170M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4860 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +136%
1.971 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4860
0.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
8
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
M97
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
M97 M2 XT (216-0731000)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy