Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

AMD FirePro W6170M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +28%
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
DG1
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net