AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1177MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+264%
6.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
GA107
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
