Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +846%
15.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
4608
48
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
AD106
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
115W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy