AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
+110%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Nov 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
Amethyst
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
