Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +20%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Nov 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy