Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
AMD Radeon R9 M280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M280X +8%
1.792 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Feb 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
112.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Saturn
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Saturn XT (216-0843024)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy