AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
+8155%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
8
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
G98
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
