Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5170M 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M
1.184 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +39%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
12
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
Emerald
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy