Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB +3313%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
AD103
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
320W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy