AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
+4362%
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
RV620
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
