AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
+643%
1.428 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
89W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
RV630
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
