AMD FirePro W4170M vs Intel Arc A370M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (1550MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
Arc A370M
+359%
3.174 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
