Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +215%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy