Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1219MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +186%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
8
320
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

26W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy